Isn't It Strange?

Isn't it strange that...

1. anyone I email or who emails me have no problem communicating, but anyone who took my money in exchange for services seems to have all kinds of email problems.
2. my family and friends with whom I communicate with have very few "crisis" problems, but those who I hired to do something for me have all kinds of personal and professional crises that stop them from delivering on their commitments to me?
3. that there's no way you can get off a call list and the script "I'm calling you because you asked for information about generating an income from home." hasn't changed?
4. that nothing works these days.. government doesn't work, people don't work, honesty doesn't work, products don't work, pills don't work.
5. what is the truth one day is a lie the next. (Re: Global Warming)
6. prisoners have better benefits and facilities than honest folk in nursing homes?
7. laws favor crooks over honest folk?
8. that we've miraculously discovered an oil-eating bacteria that doesn't deplete oxygen at just the right time?
   
9. that people are starving when our world production of food is ten times required to feed everyone?
   
10. we have yet to see Obama's birth certificate yet us taxpayers gladly and easily show ours to get a drivers license?
11. advertised $29.95/month ends up with a bill for $70.83/mo?
12. proclaimed "experts" know less than a stump?
13. our knowledge is growing exponentially and we're getting worse off?
14. we have more laws than we can enforce? Isn't it strange that the politicians can pick the law that serves their purpose best?
15. our security is much worse now that we have more surveillance cameras watching our every move?
16. known crooks are still on the streets after 20 or more felony convictions?
17. our policemen have to be "tippy toe" when making an arrest else the crook gets off scot-free?
18. it's still against the law to sit on a milk crate in New York City?
19. credit card companies can change the rules of our contract with them any time they chose without negotiation? Yet any contract we have with others are set in stone unless negotiated?
20. "fine print" is so fine that the average person can't read it?
21. the words "Promise" or "Honest" no longer mean anything?
    
22. doctors know for sure... but you don't?
23. politicians can promise anything and are not responsible for delivering anything?
24. we've had optimization and artificial intelligence software for over 20 years that could optimize the well being of all humans, and we don't use it?
25. the more money we spend on education the fewer high school graduates we turn out?
26. that our grocery bills doubled and the "cost of living" hasn't?
27. that the value of the dollar decreased by at least 20% and the stock market is falling?
28. Isn't it strange that "Original Formula" Pam contains canola oil when the original formula contained soy lecithin?
    

I could go on and on... Alice in Wonderland anyone?

I get to Show My Stupidity Today!

This note is for me.

Woke up a little while ago and in this wake-up stupor.

Here's some stupid questions to myself...

Reason? To get me out of the box.

1) How many photons does it take to make an electron (proton - Duhhh!?)? Where does the magnetic part go? (Wikipedia "Magnetic moment of an electron")
2) How fast does a black hole spin? How fast does a proton spin? How fast does an electron spin?
3) Photon = electro and magnetic.. believed to be at 90 degrees. re: index of refraction.
4) Drum fish, earth's central heating? Mother of radio activity? a resonance thing?
5) Again, similarity between proton and black hole.. a quantum dilemma?
6) Spin effects, distance relationships
7) Is a spin induced during the release of a photon?
8) Where does the magnetic part of the photon come from when a photon is released by quantum collapse of electron "orbit"? Does it come from the electron when its orbit switched to a lower level? Does this mean that the electron is now smaller?

(I'm liking the idea of getting rid of the discrete particle "electron" and call the area around a proton as being a degree of charge... jumper cables anyone?)


Tons more stupid questions... any help here?

I have not seen much about the "New Chemistry" still not being taught in the schools around here.

GOSH! THIS POST LOOKS LIKE PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL DRIBBLE!

Gravity Explained - (Continued)

Earlier, I posted a goofy diagram describing (in 2D) how I believe gravity works.

So, today, I listened to a program that described "The Hutchison Effect"

I can't believe that even this effect that uses an electrostatic field at a certain intensity and frequency (derived from those Tesla coils that were modified so they wouldn't spark like in the Frankenstein movies) fits my definition of gravity. In my mind, there's no holes in my theory yet!

Pluses and minuses.. that's all there is. (Sorry CERN.)

Now, the current Hutchinson Effect work is done using resonant frequencies which makes the effects from using it somewhat unpredictable. The result is that the effects seen are mis-interpreted and I feel John Hutchison saw the results, but doesn't quite understand what happened. This led him to (perhaps) obsessing over maintaining his credibility and his desire to reproduce the effect to save his name as well as the importance of his discovery. (Of course, there's the "TOP SECRET" government shutdown theory, too.)

Although fantastic claims of "anit-gravity", "free energy", "The Philadelphia Experiment", disappearance, melting, splintering, etc. claimed to be seen from the experiment, I can understand why the results can vary so much based on my theory of gravity.. i.e. proton shielding of the electron cloud surrounding the assembly of "atoms".

What hit me was that all the six claimed effects FIT with my theory. What are the odds of six claims fitting with my theory? An external electrostatic field which repels the external electrostatic field of all things assembled.

Here's my suggestions to John Hutchison.

1) Repeat the experiment in a vacuum to eliminate density fluctuations in the air as well as eliminate pathway interferences.

2) Don't use resonant frequencies... you have to go much higher so that there's an exact match between the wavelength used and the distance between the "electron" and "proton". Try to keep the frequency as constant as possible.

3) Focus on very fast switching, i.e. eliminate surges when the device is activated. The intensity of the field used can manifest all the claims mentioned: melting, shattering, floating, disappearing.

4) Do the experiments in complete darkness and at temperatures as cold as possible to get away from constructive/destructive interferences from the electromagnetic spectrum and "inter-atom" distance fluctuations.

i.e. Try to control the electron cloud as precisely as possible.

(My mind now floats to the magnetic part of the electromagnetic spectrum and how the free energy part comes into play... hmmmm.... Wondering now if magnetic fields were included in any of the experiments... Coral Castle?)

(Other thoughts.. which are dumb even to me right now.. but I'll share them. Energy = Mass times the speed of light cubed? ... would that account for "dark energy"?) (Could the expansion of the universe be driven by electrostatic repulsion?)

ENOUGH CRAZINESS FOR TONIGHT!