Gravity Explained - (Continued)

Earlier, I posted a goofy diagram describing (in 2D) how I believe gravity works.

So, today, I listened to a program that described "The Hutchison Effect"

I can't believe that even this effect that uses an electrostatic field at a certain intensity and frequency (derived from those Tesla coils that were modified so they wouldn't spark like in the Frankenstein movies) fits my definition of gravity. In my mind, there's no holes in my theory yet!

Pluses and minuses.. that's all there is. (Sorry CERN.)

Now, the current Hutchinson Effect work is done using resonant frequencies which makes the effects from using it somewhat unpredictable. The result is that the effects seen are mis-interpreted and I feel John Hutchison saw the results, but doesn't quite understand what happened. This led him to (perhaps) obsessing over maintaining his credibility and his desire to reproduce the effect to save his name as well as the importance of his discovery. (Of course, there's the "TOP SECRET" government shutdown theory, too.)

Although fantastic claims of "anit-gravity", "free energy", "The Philadelphia Experiment", disappearance, melting, splintering, etc. claimed to be seen from the experiment, I can understand why the results can vary so much based on my theory of gravity.. i.e. proton shielding of the electron cloud surrounding the assembly of "atoms".

What hit me was that all the six claimed effects FIT with my theory. What are the odds of six claims fitting with my theory? An external electrostatic field which repels the external electrostatic field of all things assembled.

Here's my suggestions to John Hutchison.

1) Repeat the experiment in a vacuum to eliminate density fluctuations in the air as well as eliminate pathway interferences.

2) Don't use resonant frequencies... you have to go much higher so that there's an exact match between the wavelength used and the distance between the "electron" and "proton". Try to keep the frequency as constant as possible.

3) Focus on very fast switching, i.e. eliminate surges when the device is activated. The intensity of the field used can manifest all the claims mentioned: melting, shattering, floating, disappearing.

4) Do the experiments in complete darkness and at temperatures as cold as possible to get away from constructive/destructive interferences from the electromagnetic spectrum and "inter-atom" distance fluctuations.

i.e. Try to control the electron cloud as precisely as possible.

(My mind now floats to the magnetic part of the electromagnetic spectrum and how the free energy part comes into play... hmmmm.... Wondering now if magnetic fields were included in any of the experiments... Coral Castle?)

(Other thoughts.. which are dumb even to me right now.. but I'll share them. Energy = Mass times the speed of light cubed? ... would that account for "dark energy"?) (Could the expansion of the universe be driven by electrostatic repulsion?)

ENOUGH CRAZINESS FOR TONIGHT!